Home

Sun, Nov. 8th, 2009, 03:50 pm
[i]andrewducker: My mind boggles

Why is there such a massive discrepancy between online prices and high street prices for some items?

I wanted a 16GB USB flash drive.  As we wandered through Glasgow yesterday I popped into several places looking for one, and couldn't get one beneath £30 - and prices went up to £45.

Pop on to Amazon and I have a selection of possibilities from £17.

I could understand a premium of £5 for shopping in the high street.  But double the cost?  WTF?

Sun, Nov. 8th, 2009, 01:21 pm
[i]andrewducker: Who Stats


The line is f(x)=54.09-2.09x
Created by [info]amberite over here.

Thu, Nov. 5th, 2009, 11:32 pm
[i]andrewducker: Also: Happy Guy Fox Night!


(thanks to [info]kynn for the godawful pun/picture)

Thu, Nov. 5th, 2009, 11:28 pm
[i]andrewducker: Anyone fancy the cinema?

The Men Who Stare At Goats looks delightfully Coen-esque.  It's based on the real story of the US military attempts to use paranormal forces for their own ends, played as a farce.

Also: George Clooney, Ewan McGregor, Kevin Spacey, Jeff Bridges and Robert Patrick.  Woohoo!

6:15 at the Omni centre.  Here's the trailer:


Anyone fancy it?

Wed, Nov. 4th, 2009, 10:44 pm
[i]andrewducker: Other things that make my 14-year-old self very happy


Leia and her stunt double take a nap.
From

Wed, Nov. 4th, 2009, 08:12 pm
[i]andrewducker: You can thank me later

The Cup of Tears film trailer. Dir. Gary Shore from Gary Shore on Vimeo.


Thanks to [info]imaget for that one.  Warms the heart of my inner 14-year-old.

Wed, Nov. 4th, 2009, 07:34 pm
[i]rosenblog: The books I’m trying to read


In an interview for a book-related job, the questioning went something like this:

Interviewer 1: What are you currently reading?
TSR: *takes deep breath*
Interviewer 2: Restrain yourself!!

[Yeah, Interviewer 2 had me dialed. And I did get the job.]

The sidebar ‘books I’m reading’ has been pretty static lately, mainly because I keep starting books and then not finishing them, or rather some other book gets in the way. I currently have on the go:

- George Gissing, New Grub Street. Someday I must determine why I love Gissing so much, even though his work is so depressing, whereas Thomas Hardy’s work is also depressing but makes me want to stab myself with a sharpened pen. The problem is that this will probably require me to read more Hardy, and that is something I do not wish to do. I am rereading NGS in the hopes that it will make me feel better to be reminded that, in fact, there never was a prelapsarian publishing era of joy, and authors have always had it tough. Status: just begun.

- Jane Austen, Northanger Abbey. Required reading. I like it, but I really want to reread Persuasion and Sense and Sensibility. Status: just begun.

- Stieg Larsson, The Girl Who Played With Fire. I mistakenly thought this was the first in the series, though as the library won’t be able to get me that one for weeks, I might as well start with this. I am trying to approach this book with an open mind, but given that the original title of book number one is Men Who Hate Women, I have the feeling I may finish the book solely to avoid ‘but you haven’t READ IT’ arguments (though these will undoubtedly be replaced with arguments that include the words ‘you feminists’ and ‘no sense of humor’). Status: just begun.

- Tom Brown and Henry McLeish, Scotland: A Suitable Case for Treatment. Am toying with writing something set in an independent Scotland (those cries you hear are the Scottish Nationalists a-whoopin’ and a-hollerin’), and picked this up in a quest to figure out how Scots view Scottish national identity. Still not entirely sure, though most seem to agree that the deep-fried Mars bar is an aberration. Status: a third finished.

- Tobias Smollett, Humphrey Clinker. I have a woefully deficient background in 18th century literature so I figured this would help fill the gap. Also, I can read bits aloud to my Scottish friends, who splutter amusingly when they hear nice things about Alloa and Greenock. Status: three-quarters finished.

And don’t even ask about the BTR stacks/shelves. No, really, please don’t….

Wed, Nov. 4th, 2009, 11:01 am
[i]andrewducker: Delicious LiveJournal Links for 11-4-2009

Tue, Nov. 3rd, 2009, 05:44 pm
[i]andrewducker: For your delectation

Gonzo Journalism:

[info]linkmachinego

Horrible _and_ funny


Tragedy:

(also via [info]linkmachinego

and most overwhelingly unlikely event of the day:
Uwe Boll makes a movie about Darfur. Using actual rape victims to play rape victims. With Billy Zane and Edward Furlong in it. here

Now I have to go run Cthulhu...

Tue, Nov. 3rd, 2009, 01:37 pm
[i]andrewducker: The whole Nutt case

Just to be clear - I have no problem with researchers stating the results of their research, and scientists advising the government clearly have to be able to do so.

Where I'm coming from is that I saw a bunch of headlines on one day, where David Nutt was attacking the government over their drugs policy and accusing them of devaluing and distorting the evidence, followed by the unsurprising headline the next day that he had been sacked.

Now, had his lecture been a simple statement of the facts, he'd have been fine.  Stating his own preferred classification?  Not a problem.  But as soon as you start publically criticising your employer (no matter what kind of employment it is, paid, unpaid, consultancy or permanent) you are basically making it impossible to have a good working environment.  If you are correct to criticise them then you'll have to do it from the outside.  There are exceptions to this (criticising awful working conditions which management refuses to correct) - but this doesn't sound like one of those times to me.

Now, I'm sadly failing to find out what, exactly, he did say.  All the sentences I can find simply quote fractions of sentences, which is bugger all use.

Anyone able to find a decent quote for me?

Tue, Nov. 3rd, 2009, 11:32 am
[i]andrewducker: Tolerance


Thanks to [info]supergee

Tue, Nov. 3rd, 2009, 07:51 am
[i]andrewducker: A question of policy

Poll #1480150
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 38

If I made public statements that the policy of my employers was wrong I would probably lose my job

View Answers

Yes - and this is reasonable
13 (34.2%)

Yes - but this is not reasonable
11 (28.9%)

No
14 (36.8%)



Note - by "public" here, I mean to people outside of the company, like journalists or similar, not openly to people inside of the company.

20 most recent